MisterSynergy added a comment.
In T261275#6616930 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T261275#6616930>, @Lydia_Pintscher wrote: > | | **page is moved to an non-excluded namespace** | **page is moved to an excluded namespace** | > | **suppress redirect is checked** | sitelink on the Item is updated to the new target | sitelink is removed from the Item | > | **suppress redirect is not checked** | sitelink on the Item is updated to the new target | sitelink is untouched | > | > > But now I'm questioning myself on the bottom right cell. I agree with all four. Bottom right is indeed the complicated one; therein, the untouched sitelink is now a redirect and it points to a target that might not be very useful content-wise (as the page would not have been moved otherwise). Yet, I think the software should reliably manage that only **existing pages** are connected, not necessarily only **useful pages**. Once redirects are being permitted as regular sitelinks (without that ugly hack), we could also look into ways to add the already available redirect badges to those sitelinks. This would make the outcome much more managable for the community which then could decide whether the remaining redirect sitelink is actually useful, and not just existing. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T261275 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: MisterSynergy Cc: MisterSynergy, Mike_Peel, noarave, ChristianKl, Mohammed_Sadat_WMDE, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Akuckartz, Iflorez, alaa_wmde, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
