JanZerebecki added a comment. All the software I checked that handles XSD types implement XSD 1.0 BCE years. Together we know of nothing that implements XSD 1.1 BCE years. I'd suggest we produce output for the RDF tools that exist.
> "The calendar model used for saving the data is always the proleptic > Gregorian calendar according to ISO 8601". And that does not refer to the 2000 version, so 0000 is an invalid year. I'm not aware of any changes there. It is just not rejected during validation, like a Feb 31. > We have to await their report and suggestions before deciding what to do in > RDF. The only review I'm aware of is related to dates in Julian calendar only. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94064 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Smalyshev, JanZerebecki Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, Denny, Manybubbles, daniel, mkroetzsch, Smalyshev, JanZerebecki, Aklapper, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, GWicke _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
