Asaf added a comment.
I apologize if I missed something, but if we do end up separating into different *lexemes*, how do we retain the value of all the descriptive work done on one lexeme (presumably the more common or standard form) that equally-well describes the form in the other lexeme? Do we rely on some sameAs property and then on applications and re-users to consider that property and auto-merge/import statements from the other lexeme? To give a concrete example, if the rich lexeme currently at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L189 were split, how would we make sure the sample sentences, etymology, etc., would be discoverable from the other lexeme? To my mind, that's the main disadvantage of any solution that would involve separating into multiple lexemes. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T236593 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Asaf Cc: LucasWerkmeister, C933103, AGutman-WMF, mxn, So9q, Ijon, daniel, Asaf, Mahir256, Danmichaelo, Fnielsen, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Denny, Lydia_Pintscher, jeblad, jhsoby, Astuthiodit_1, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
