Abbe98 added a comment.
I'm interested in working on this across OpenRefine, the WikibaseManifest extension and "TIB's" reconciliation service but I wonder if this work wouldn't benefit from being migrated to a proper vocabulary for describing APIs and knowledge graphs. Like Hydra and DCAT or schema.org instead of relying on a JSON file with more or less tool specific fields. It would have a lot of benefits like interoperability and extensibility, so one could for example have an Wikibase manifest describing multiple reconciliation services, or describing any API with an OpenAPI spec, or a W3C URI, etc. We could then just describe the reconciliation and for things like the template for edit summaries one could just use a custom property? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T266344 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Abbe98 Cc: Abbe98, Pintoch, Aklapper, Danny_Benjafield_WMDE, Astuthiodit_1, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
