Abbe98 added a comment.
> If it is in the document served by WikibaseManifest, then as a tool author I have the same problem as currently: if I wanted to make sure that all of my tool's configuration can be derived from the contents of the WikibaseManifest, then whenever I need to introduce a configuration parameter to implement a new feature in my tool, I first need to submit a patch to WikibaseManifest for it to expose this information (be it namespaced or not), get it merged, get a new version of the extension be released and deployed on the wikis I want to interact with. I think the vocabularies could be hosted centrally by the tools/specs although it doesn't matter as all you need is the namespace URI, the actual tool-specific configuration could just be a MediaWiki page similar to how many other extensions expose settings. Or if one wants to get fancy an extension to the MediaWiki settings. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T266344 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Abbe98 Cc: Abbe98, Pintoch, Aklapper, Danny_Benjafield_WMDE, Astuthiodit_1, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
