Ottomata added a comment.

I'd like an actual timestamp to be part of the framing for all events too.  I'm 
all for a reqid, (although I'd bikeshed about the name a bit), but Having a 
standardized canonical timestamp in all events is very useful.  Can we add:

- **ts**: iso 8601 timestamp.  This may be the time of the event creation, or 
it might be something else.  It can be set by the producer.

> Generally, no overly sensitive information (like client IPs for authenticated 
> edits) in primary events.

>  Can be included in expanded message in separate topic, or stored separately 
> based on reqid.


In the meeting we said that MW would generate two event streams directly, one 
that had more information, and another that had less, minus fields with privacy 
concerns.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T116247

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Ottomata
Cc: Smalyshev, yuvipanda, Hardikj, daniel, aaron, GWicke, mobrovac, MZMcBride, 
bd808, JanZerebecki, Halfak, Krenair, brion, chasemp, Eevans, mmodell, 
Ottomata, Mattflaschen, Matanya, Aklapper, JAllemandou, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, 
Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, RobLa-WMF, jeremyb



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to