Ottomata added a comment. > So the producer would store the same time stamp twice? UUID v1 already > contains it.
Could you provide an example of what this UUID would look like? A reason for having a timestamp only field is so that applications can use it for time based logic without having to also know how to extract the timestamp out of an overloaded uuid. Also, who is responsible for setting this reqid? In many cases, varnish, right? A producer may emit several events during a given request, and it should have to ability to set what it considers to be the real timestamp of each event. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T116247 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Ottomata Cc: Smalyshev, yuvipanda, Hardikj, daniel, aaron, GWicke, mobrovac, MZMcBride, bd808, JanZerebecki, Halfak, Krenair, brion, chasemp, Eevans, mmodell, Ottomata, Mattflaschen, Matanya, Aklapper, JAllemandou, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, RobLa-WMF, jeremyb _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
