Ottomata added a comment. > @Ottomata, I think understanding the semantics of an event primarily requires > knowledge of the topic.
Hm, I don't think this is true. You will need some understanding of what a historical dataset is, but that's all. The historical datasets are going to be made up of many revisions of the same schema. January may have data validated with schema revision 1, and February with schema revision 2. If you don't know which exact schema-revision an event was validated with, you will have a hard time reasoning about what the data looks like. This will be especially true if we are attempting to do Avro conversion. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T116247 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: mobrovac, Ottomata Cc: intracer, EBernhardson, Smalyshev, yuvipanda, Hardikj, daniel, aaron, GWicke, mobrovac, MZMcBride, bd808, JanZerebecki, Halfak, Krenair, brion, chasemp, Eevans, mmodell, Ottomata, Mattflaschen, Matanya, Aklapper, JAllemandou, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, RobLa-WMF, jeremyb _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
