On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Andrew Gray <andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk>
wrote:

> One other issue to bear in mind: it's *simple* to have properties as a
> separate thing. I have been following this discussion with some
> interest but... well, I don't think I'm particularly stupid, but most
> of it is completely above my head.
>
> Saying "here are items, here are a set of properties you can define
> relating to them, here's some notes on how to use properties" is going
> to get a lot more people able to contribute than if they need to start
> understanding theoretical aspects of semantic relationships...


Definitely, I cannot agree more. TBH, the original question of this thread
was already settled some messages ago.
I understand that it might result confusing that we have wandered off into
other realms, so I consider that it is better to consider this thread
closed and I will consider opening a new one with the right topic (which is
quite different as it started :-P)

Cheers,
Micru
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to