On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Andrew Gray <andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
> One other issue to bear in mind: it's *simple* to have properties as a > separate thing. I have been following this discussion with some > interest but... well, I don't think I'm particularly stupid, but most > of it is completely above my head. > > Saying "here are items, here are a set of properties you can define > relating to them, here's some notes on how to use properties" is going > to get a lot more people able to contribute than if they need to start > understanding theoretical aspects of semantic relationships... Definitely, I cannot agree more. TBH, the original question of this thread was already settled some messages ago. I understand that it might result confusing that we have wandered off into other realms, so I consider that it is better to consider this thread closed and I will consider opening a new one with the right topic (which is quite different as it started :-P) Cheers, Micru
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l