For paintings you can better look here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_sum_of_all_paintings
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Valentine Charles <valentine...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I wanted to get an overview of all the properties used boy the instance > Painting (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3305213) for further mapping > with the Europeana Data Model. > My initial thought that I would find a representative list at > http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Visual_arts/Item_structure > but in fact I have found much more properties used in association with > painting. So I was wondering whether it would be a good idea to update the > template mentioned above with the additional properties. > I think it would be really interesting for GLAMs to have access to to > representative templates listing all the properties used for a given type > of objects. It would help them to understand Wikidata and to compare it > with their own data. I think it would also help mappings activities. I on > behalf of Europeana would be happy to help in this task and also facilitate > the discussions with GLAMs around Wikidata. > > What do you think? > > Best wishes, > Valentine > > 2015-04-04 23:45 GMT+02:00 Stas Malyshev <smalys...@wikimedia.org>: > >> Hi! >> >> > For things that actually *are* free text, and not terribly long, a >> monolongual >> > (or, in the future, multilingual) text property could be used. "quote" >> already >> > exists, "abstract" could be added, pending community discussion. Length >> > limitations can be adjusted if need be. >> >> Maybe if the need of bigger texts arises we can have separate field >> type? Right now the storage model is not very good for storing texts of >> non-negligible sizes, especially multilingual ones (x800 languages). >> OTOH, we have a type that allows us to use multimedia by integrating >> with Commons. So maybe the same idea with using some other wiki - >> quotes? sources? for bigger text snippets would work too? Just >> brainstorming here :) >> >> > What I was warning against is continuing the misuse of text fields for >> > semi-structured or even fully structured data that I have often seen in >> GLAM >> > meta-data. That kind of thing should not be copied to Wikidata. >> >> Right. I think it may be useful here to understand which kinds of text >> we're talking about which can't be structured but are big enough to >> cause concern. I.e. if it's quotes - we already have wikiquote, right? >> Etc. >> >> -- >> Stas Malyshev >> smalys...@wikimedia.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
