Hi, I put a link about this on the frwiki chat : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Le_Bistro/21_avril_2015#Liste_des_plus_grandes_villes_avec_des_maires_f.C3.A9minies
Let's see if this can shake community a little bit :) 2015-04-21 13:22 GMT+02:00 Markus Krötzsch <mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org>: > On 21.04.2015 12:28, Maxime Lathuilière wrote: > >> nice! >> >> but I can't figure out why Paris (P90 >> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q90>) and Anne Hidalgo (Q2851133 >> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2851133>) don't show up in the results >> given that: >> >> Q90 >> P31: Q515 >> P6: Q2851133 (with no P582q) >> >> Q2851133 >> P21: Q6581072 >> >> what could be wrong? >> > > Interesting. It seems that Paris has no population! > > Markus > > >> -- >> >> Maxime Lathuilière >> maxlath.eu <http://maxlath.eu> - @maxlath >> Inventaire <https://inventaire.io> - @inventaire_io >> wiki(pedia|data): Zorglub27 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Zorglub27 >> > >> >> >> Le 21/04/2015 12:03, Markus Krötzsch a écrit : >> >>> On 21.04.2015 11:27, Daniel Kinzler wrote: >>> >>>> Am 21.04.2015 um 00:50 schrieb Markus Krötzsch: >>>> >>>>> On 20.04.2015 23:47, Daniel Kinzler wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Something seems to be wrong with the order, though. Munich (pop > >>>>>> 1m in all >>>>>> statements) is listed way after Chemnitz (pop < 300k in all >>>>>> statements). Any >>>>>> idea why? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Good catch. My query was too simple (using one "random" population >>>>> instead of >>>>> the biggest one). Here is a better query, this time even with >>>>> populations given: >>>>> >>>> >>>> I still wonder how the old result came about, since the *all* >>>> population values >>>> for Munich are much bigger than *all* the population numbers for >>>> Chemnitz. Even >>>> with picking a random value, how could the order have been reversed? >>>> >>> >>> Good question. I don't know. Maybe there is some issue in Virtuoso >>> here after all. However, the rest of the order looked sensible to me >>> even in the old query. It could also be that our (non-live) data had a >>> temporary glitch that has been fixed on Wikidata in the meantime; one >>> should check the population values we get with SPARQL to be sure. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Markus >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
