Hey, Thanks for your feedback. That's exactly what I'm looking for. On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:29 PM Paul Houle <ontolo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's a step in the right direction, but it took a very long time to load > on my computer. > It's maybe related to labs recent issues. Now I get reasonable time: http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/eq1i3s/http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php > > After the initial load, it was pretty peppy, then I ran the default > example that is grayed in but not active (I had to retype it) > I made some modifications that might help; > Then I get the page that says "results are ready" and how cool they are, > then it takes me a while to figure out what I am looking at and finally > realize it is a comparison of data quality metrics (which I think are all > fact counts) between all of the P31 predicates and the Q5. > I made some changes so you can see things easier. I appreciate if you suggest some words I put in the description; > The use of the graphic on the first row complicated this for me. > > Please sugest something I write there for people :); > There are a lot of broken links on this page too such as > > http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/sitelink.php > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/P31 > The property broken should be fixed by now and sitelink is broken because It's not there yet. I'll make it very soon; > > > and of course no merged in documentation about what P31 and Q5 are. > Opaque identifiers are necessary for your project, but > > Also some way to find the P's and Q's hooked up to this would be most > welcome. > > Done, Now we have label for everything; > It's a great start and is completely in the right direction but it could > take many sprints of improvement. > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hoi, >> What would be nice is to have an option to understand progress from one >> dump to the next like you can with the Statistics by Magnus. Magnus also >> has data on sources but this is more global. >> Thanks, >> GerardM >> >> On 8 December 2015 at 21:41, Markus Krötzsch < >> mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Amir, >>> >>> Very nice, thanks! I like the general approach of having a stand-alone >>> tool for analysing the data, and maybe pointing you to issues. Like a >>> dashboard for Wikidata editors. >>> >>> What backend technology are you using to produce these results? Is this >>> live data or dumped data? One could also get those numbers from the SPARQL >>> endpoint, but performance might be problematic (since you compute averages >>> over all items; a custom approach would of course be much faster but then >>> you have the data update problem). >>> >>> An obvious feature request would be to display entity ids as links to >>> the appropriate page, and maybe with their labels (in a language of your >>> choice). >>> >>> But overall very nice. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Markus >>> >>> >>> On 08.12.2015 18:48, Amir Ladsgroup wrote: >>> >>>> Hey, >>>> There has been several discussion regarding quality of information in >>>> Wikidata. I wanted to work on quality of wikidata but we don't have any >>>> source of good information to see where we are ahead and where we are >>>> behind. So I thought the best thing I can do is to make something to >>>> show people how exactly sourced our data is with details. So here we >>>> have *http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php* >>>> >>>> You can give only a property (let's say P31) and it gives you the four >>>> most used values + analyze of sources and quality in overall (check this >>>> out <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P31>) >>>> and then you can see about ~33% of them are sources which 29.1% of >>>> them are based on Wikipedia. >>>> You can give a property and multiple values you want. Let's say you want >>>> to compare P27:Q183 (Country of citizenship: Germany) and P27:Q30 (US) >>>> Check this out >>>> <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P27&q=Q30|Q183>. And >>>> you can see US biographies are more abundant (300K over 200K) but German >>>> biographies are more descriptive (3.8 description per item over 3.2 >>>> description over item) >>>> >>>> One important note: Compare P31:Q5 (a trivial statement) 46% of them are >>>> not sourced at all and 49% of them are based on Wikipedia **but* *get >>>> this statistics for population properties (P1082 >>>> <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P1082>) It's not a >>>> trivial statement and we need to be careful about them. It turns out >>>> there are slightly more than one reference per statement and only 4% of >>>> them are based on Wikipedia. So we can relax and enjoy these >>>> highly-sourced data. >>>> >>>> Requests: >>>> >>>> * Please tell me whether do you want this tool at all >>>> * Please suggest more ways to analyze and catch unsourced materials >>>> >>>> Future plan (if you agree to keep using this tool): >>>> >>>> * Support more datatypes (e.g. date of birth based on year, >>>> coordinates) >>>> * Sitelink-based and reference-based analysis (to check how much of >>>> articles of, let's say, Chinese Wikipedia are unsourced) >>>> >>>> * Free-style analysis: There is a database for this tool that can be >>>> used for way more applications. You can get the most unsourced >>>> statements of P31 and then you can go to fix them. I'm trying to >>>> build a playground for this kind of tasks) >>>> >>>> I hope you like this and rock on! >>>> <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P136&q=Q11399> >>>> Best >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikidata mailing list >>>> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikidata mailing list >>> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> >> > > > -- > Paul Houle > > *Applying Schemas for Natural Language Processing, Distributed Systems, > Classification and Text Mining and Data Lakes* > > (607) 539 6254 paul.houle on Skype ontolo...@gmail.com > > :BaseKB -- Query Freebase Data With SPARQL > http://basekb.com/gold/ > > Legal Entity Identifier Lookup > https://legalentityidentifier.info/lei/lookup/ > <http://legalentityidentifier.info/lei/lookup/> > > Join our Data Lakes group on LinkedIn > https://www.linkedin.com/grp/home?gid=8267275 > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
