On 5 March 2016 at 16:15, Markus Krötzsch <mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
> I agree with Egon that the uniqueness requirement is rather weird. What it > means is that a thing is only considered an "identifier" if it points to a > database that uses a similar granularity for modelling the world as > Wikidata. If the external database is more fine-grained than Wikidata > (several ids for one item), then it is not a valid "identifier", according > to the uniqueness idea. Then we should create a Wikidata item for each concept on that external database. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
