Hi Lydia, all,

On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Markus Krötzsch
<mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
> On 05.03.2016 14:45, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
>> Give it another 2 to 3 weeks and it'll get there. More and more editors
>> are exposed to the separation in the UI now and start noticing the ones
>> that intuitively should be moved into the identifier section.
>
> Ok, let's see what happens. I am not saying that the other criteria applied
> now in the discussions are bad. It's just another use of the datatype than I
> would have expected.

I'm one of the people who noticed the separation and indeed wondered
why some of the chemistry-related identifiers I tagged and added in
the long lists of identifiers were not included yet...

What is the exact process? Do you just plan to wait longer to see if
anyone supports/contradicts my tagging? Should I get other Wikidata
users and contributors to back up my suggestion?

Originally, I though the idea was just to remove/leave/add them in/to
the list, but people started making comments now. I will do this more
explicitly now. Also for the IDs I added.

Egon

-- 
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286
ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/EgonWillighagen

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to