Hi Lydia, all, On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Markus Krötzsch <mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote: > On 05.03.2016 14:45, Lydia Pintscher wrote: >> Give it another 2 to 3 weeks and it'll get there. More and more editors >> are exposed to the separation in the UI now and start noticing the ones >> that intuitively should be moved into the identifier section. > > Ok, let's see what happens. I am not saying that the other criteria applied > now in the discussions are bad. It's just another use of the datatype than I > would have expected.
I'm one of the people who noticed the separation and indeed wondered why some of the chemistry-related identifiers I tagged and added in the long lists of identifiers were not included yet... What is the exact process? Do you just plan to wait longer to see if anyone supports/contradicts my tagging? Should I get other Wikidata users and contributors to back up my suggestion? Originally, I though the idea was just to remove/leave/add them in/to the list, but people started making comments now. I will do this more explicitly now. Also for the IDs I added. Egon -- E.L. Willighagen Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/EgonWillighagen _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
