On 07.01.2017 15:27, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
The biggest casualty of the current mess is that people like me do not
care at all about it. It cannot be explained, nobody is interested in
explaining it and consequently there is little use for it. It is "must
have" so it is there.. fine, lets move on.

The subclass of and instance of statements are actually used in very many WDQS queries, often with * expressions to navigate the hierarchy. WDQ also had a special feature TREE for this purpose. So I'd say that this part of the data is rather important to Wikidata. But if you find little use in it, that's ok too. Nevertheless, we should try to fix the modelling errors there, since they will affect many other people's Wikidata experience.

Cheers,

Markus


On 7 January 2017 at 10:39, Markus Kroetzsch
<markus.kroetz...@tu-dresden.de <mailto:markus.kroetz...@tu-dresden.de>>
wrote:



    On 06.01.2017 18:24, Thomas Douillard wrote:

            Same entity can be treated both as class and individual


        This is valid for OWL as well.


    Yes, and since Wikidata does not feature very powerful ontological
    statements, you could treat this like in OWL 2 DL semantically as
    well, i.e., a weak approach where the "class" and the "instance" are
    not really identified works.

    Nevertheless, using the ontology might still be challenging
    depending on what you want to do with it, since there are quite a
    few meta-levels (classes of classes of classes ...) that are not
    cleanly separated. When I last checked, we even had some instance-of
    cycles ;-) Even this is not a technical problem for the OWL
    semantics, but maybe for some tools and approaches.

    Cheers,

    Markus


        2017-01-05 22:21 GMT+01:00 Stas Malyshev
        <smalys...@wikimedia.org <mailto:smalys...@wikimedia.org>
        <mailto:smalys...@wikimedia.org <mailto:smalys...@wikimedia.org>>>:

            Hi!

            > The best you can get in terms of "downloading the wikidata
        ontology" would be to
            > download all properties and all the items representing
        classes. We currently
            > don't have a separate dump for these. Also, do not expect
        this to be a concise
            > or consistent model that can be used for reasoning. You
        are bound to find
            > contradictions and lose ends.

            Also, Wikidata Toolkit
        (https://github.com/Wikidata/Wikidata-Toolkit
        <https://github.com/Wikidata/Wikidata-Toolkit>
            <https://github.com/Wikidata/Wikidata-Toolkit
        <https://github.com/Wikidata/Wikidata-Toolkit>>)
            can be used to generate something like taxonomy - see e.g.

        
http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-exports/rdf/exports/20160801/dump_download.html
        
<http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-exports/rdf/exports/20160801/dump_download.html>

        
<http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-exports/rdf/exports/20160801/dump_download.html
        
<http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-exports/rdf/exports/20160801/dump_download.html>>

            But one has to be careful with it as Wikidata may not (and
        frequently
            does not) follow assumptions that are true for proper OWL
        models - there
            are no limits on what can be considered a class, a subclass, an
            instance, etc. Same entity can be treated both as class and
        individual,
            and there may be some weird structures, including even
        outright errors
            such as cycles in subclass graph, etc. And, of course, it
        changes all
            the time :)

            --
            Stas Malyshev
            smalys...@wikimedia.org <mailto:smalys...@wikimedia.org>
        <mailto:smalys...@wikimedia.org <mailto:smalys...@wikimedia.org>>

            _______________________________________________
            Wikidata mailing list
            Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
        <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
        <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
        <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>>
            https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
        <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
            <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
        <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>>




        _______________________________________________
        Wikidata mailing list
        Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
        https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
        <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>


    _______________________________________________
    Wikidata mailing list
    Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
    <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>




_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to