There is an rdf representation of wiktionary. Search for "linguistic linked data" and LEMON
On Jul 9, 2017 11:31, "Amirouche" <amirou...@hypermove.net> wrote: > > > Le 09/07/2017 à 08:53, Timothy Holborn a écrit : > >> Hi Peter, >> >> Awesome. Yes. this is the sort of thing i was looking to leverage. I >> couldn't find the RDF output for wordnet. FWIW: i find this useful >> http://osds.openlinksw.com/ >> >> Still v.interested to understand how we might further enhance what exists >> in Wiki style; mind, such a project is too much for me to take-on alone. >> > > I think that's the purpose of the 'wiktionary in wikidata' project. I > started working on importing data from wiktionaries but stopped for some > reasons.. Otherwise said, it's not readily available. > > >> thank you. i'll put the reference to immediate use ;) >> >> Tim. >> >> On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 at 16:46 Peter Haase <p...@metaphacts.com <mailto: >> p...@metaphacts.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Timothy, >> >> have you looked at WordNet and its RDF version? >> http://wordnet.princeton.edu >> http://wordnet-rdf.princeton.edu >> >> Here is your example “identity”: >> http://wordnet-rdf.princeton.edu/wn31/identity-n >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> >> On 9. Jul 2017, at 06:18, Timothy Holborn >>> <timothy.holb...@gmail.com <mailto:timothy.holb...@gmail.com>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was working on the term 'identity' with respect to internet >>> stuff; and thereafter started looking for an RDF source for an >>> english thesaurus or dictionary; and couldn't find one. I found >>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Main_Page but it didn't >>> seem to have well-formed RDF output; as to act as an ontological >>> source (rather than simply the use of RDF for SEO). >>> >>> thereafter started writing; this is where i got up to, >>> >>> Project Purpose >>> To generate an RDF compliant dictionary and thesaurus for the >>> purpose of ontological reuse on the web. >>> >>> PROBLEM >>> We use language to develop web-pages that have inferred human >>> considered meaning. Yet, the definition of these terms are not >>> necessarily machine readable. >>> >>> For Example: "identity". >>> >>> When working on 'digital identity' this is often considered to >>> have the meaning of how people log-in to their personal accounts >>> or means in which to interact with their personal data; or that >>> of others. HOWEVER, identity can also mean 'sameness'; which >>> can also be useful for organisations such as website operators to >>> say 'these people have one of my website identities' that is to >>> say, they're all consumers. >>> >>> http://www.dictionary.com/browse/identity >>> >>> This can be further clarified by looking at the different >>> meanings provided to the same word via a thesaurus: >>> http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/identity >>> >>> I thereafter looked for a way in which a statement of exactness >>> could be made via RDF; but couldn't find an appropriate RDF >>> dictionary resource. >>> >>> SOLUTION >>> Build an online dictionary and thesaurus that is >>> machine-readable. It makes sense that this may best be done with >>> wiki technology. >>> >>> FEATURES >>> - The project would firstly focus on the lexicography of the >>> english language and related dialects. This is expected to >>> include works in adding latin predicates. >>> - The project would produce a comprehensive thesaurus, including >>> unique identifiers for different uses of the same term >>> (supporting a comprehension of the differentiation in the use of >>> that term). >>> - The project would produce a platform that provided RDF output >>> in a number of serialisations. >>> - Would provide the means for people to add / edit content on the >>> site. >>> >>> PRODUCTION METHOD >>> It is hoped the site can be rapidly populated using scripts to >>> ingest existing information from freely available sources; and to >>> populate the system with information in an RDF compliant format; >>> that may be altered, edited, updated in a ‘wiki’ like fashion. >>> >>> USES >>> For the communication of specific concepts in a manner that may >>> be further clarified by both human and machine observers; as to >>> ensure parties are communicating and/or developing works upon a >>> basis of common understanding of the meaning provided to the >>> language used. >>> >>> I had concerns that the WikiData site seemed to be better >>> orientated towards the concept of schema.org/thing >>> <http://schema.org/thing> rather than a 'language' or other form >>> of predicate. Please let me know your thoughts? Perhaps i've >>> missed something entirely and this exists already? Perhaps >>> people have been thinking about it elsewhere? perhaps barriers >>> exist, that i'm not aware of... >>> >>> Timothy Holborn. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikidata mailing list >>> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
