Hi Maria,

On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 07:29 -0500, Maria Droujkova wrote:

> Wayne,
> 
> What are more names to look up on the subject, especially metalearning
> and teaching/learning in communities of practice including "community
> objects" in relationships? This is extremely useful, and I need to
> educate myself better. From all I know, separating instructional
> design from curriculum development is a dangerous idea originating in
> the "assembly line" mentality. Intuitively, content and activity
> developers (in the plural) should work together in a coherent
> community of practice which includes learners as active participants.


It's never easy to suggest a list of readings that adequately cover an
area of research interest like open distance learning.  What to include?
-- inevitably the readings you leave off the list are more important
than those included ;-).  Rather than attempting to provide a
comprehensive or authoritative list -- I think, that there are two
aspects for WikiEducator to consider as we work towards building a
sustainable model for OER instructional texts using a peer collaboration
model.

1.  There is a lot we can learn from the distance education experience
regarding the design and incorporation of integrated learning activities

This thread is about instructional texts and the relationship between
content and form as expressed in the process of learning design. Much of
the research on instructional text was pre-Web (gee hard to believe that
most of us actually lived in that time --- the Web is only 5000 days
old!  see: Kevin Kelly
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J132shgIiuY&feature=related ).  In the
pre web days the dominant mass communication technology used by distance
educators / learners was the printed text.  The challenge for distance
educators was how do you teach effectively when the learner is separated
from the teaching in time, place and pace.  I've already mentioned the
work of Derek Rowntree and Fred Lockwood but would also consider taking
a look at Borje Holmberg's postulates around guided didactic
conversation and the relationships between simulated and real
lecturer-student interactions.

Michael Moore's work on transactional distance provides an insightful
analysis of the relationships between structure and dialogue regarding
teaching-learning interactions in asynchronous learning environments.

Peter Johansson has done a lot of work on instructional texts from a
Psychology perspective. With regards to the Metalearning research of the
1980s and 1990s the work of John B Biggs is a good starting point.
Biggs' work provides a research base confirming that the design of
appropriate learning activities and  assessment strategies can promote
deep learning. What's interesting with this research is the evidence
that "low ability" learners using deep learning strategies can achieve
learning outputs which compare favourably with "high ability" learners
-- hence making a strong case for the incorporation of well-designed and
engaging learning activities in asynchronous materials. 

You make a very good point regarding the risks of separating learning
design from content development -- referencing communities of practice.
In the distance education world -- the large single-mode distance
education providers pioneered and implemented what we call the "Course
Team" approach. These DE institutions constituted professional
development teams comprising subject matter experts, learning designers,
multimedia professionals, graphic designers and editors who worked
collaboratively in developing the learning materials.  The wiki
environment provides us with the opportunity to constitute distributed
course development teams --- and I'm hope that the WikiEducator
community can develop and refine processes to replicate this model for
OER using social software. We piloted the approach with the development
of the OER Handbook. The primary author was based in the US, we
commissioned a critical content reviewer who was based in South Africa,
our graphic designer we located in New Zealand and I tried to assist
with some learning design here in Vancouver. We learned about processes
for managing a distributed course team -- and we will use these
experiences to refine and develop wiki specific tools for more effective
collaboration.  

Sure -- in many respects this is dated research -- but the advantage is
that we're not starting from scratch :-)

2. It is both plausible and conceivable that OER peer collaboration
might result in emergent pedagogies that are structurally different from
what has gone before 

In this regard, I'd recommend that you consult the work of Otto Peters
on the industrialisation of teaching. Using a pedagogical, historical
and sociological analysis, Peter's has argued that the pedagogy of
distance education (DE) is structurally different from the pedagogy
associated with face-to-face teaching.  He suggests that DE is a
consequence of the industrialisation of society.  If the knowledge
society is structurally different from industrialised society -- the
open question we could ask is whether we will see a "new" pedagogy
emerging which is structurally different from both agrarian and
industrial approaches?

Fascinating stuff ....

Cheers
Wayne
 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to