By "community consensus" I mean the result of "community wide discussion". Community consensus does not mean a discrete discussions by an elite number of editors in some hidden sub project page no one cares about. - White Cat
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Martijn Hoekstra <martijnhoeks...@gmail.com > wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Marc Riddell > <michaeldavi...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> on 1/13/09 2:33 AM, White Cat at wikipedia.kawaii.n...@gmail.com wrote: > >> > >> In other words there is a lack of consensus. Meaning no mass action of > any > >> kind should be taken until a consensus is secured. > >> > > On any given subject within the Project, how does someone go about > achieving > > consensus? And how and when do you determine that a consensus has been > > reached? > > > > Marc Riddell > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > WikiEN-l mailing list > > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > > > > I have been trying to write an essay on that for ages on that: see > [[WP:TINCON]] > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
