on 1/13/09 8:36 AM, White Cat at wikipedia.kawaii.n...@gmail.com wrote: > When consensus is reached the relevant pages are updated accordingly. In > general major changes (such as the one in discussion) is voted upon by the > entire community. Not five or six editors but hundreds of editors. The > voting happens after there is an agreement on the general principles - even > if such an agreement is partial or temporary.
WC, how is it determined that this agreement has been reached? > During the vote people are > given the option to support/oppose different approaches. Is there a set time for the vote? And, if so, how is it set? Marc > > - White Cat > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Marc Riddell > <michaeldavi...@comcast.net>wrote: > >>> on 1/13/09 2:33 AM, White Cat at wikipedia.kawaii.n...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> In other words there is a lack of consensus. Meaning no mass action of >> any >>> kind should be taken until a consensus is secured. >>> >> On any given subject within the Project, how does someone go about >> achieving >> consensus? And how and when do you determine that a consensus has been >> reached? >> >> Marc Riddell >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WikiEN-l mailing list >> WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >> > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
