On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:40 AM, brewhaha%40edmc.net <brewh...@edmc.net>wrote:
> > a.. 2007-09-05T20:26:03 (hist) (diff) m Talk:Muhammad ? (moved > Talk:Muhammad > to Talk:Muhammad raped little children, and he was a known prostitute, aka > male whore. He worshiped Satan and sacrificed babies in his name.) > > Okay...This is about the worst I hav found, and it does not go under the > heading of common assault. So, where is this stuff where Jeremy Hanson > makes > threats about doing things like this? Overall, he seems like a bot that > likes moving things to "HAGGER????". Under verizon's acceptable use policy, > if they were enforcing it, yes, he could find himself and his mother > disjoined from the internet. Under the law though, it is not common > assault, > so that hoped-for visit from feds is not likely. Hate-crimes? I did not > look > there, yet. They are not big in the western world. Remember the cartoons > published? So, in total, I think range blocks are the best way to go. > People > with IDs will still be able to edit from verizon, and in fact people can > obtain IDs via-e-mail, so I think "collateral damage" is a strong term for > unintentional and temporary blocks. This will let the clerks nail down all > of Grawp's accounts before he creates new ones. In a world of rampant > excellence, verizon's users will ask verizon why, and verizon will ask > someone at wikipedia in turn. Where is the common assault? > You clearly haven't looked very far then. He's made hundreds of attacks on editors in page moves and username creations. I won't say what they are, but I assure you, they are nasty. -- Alex (User:Majorly) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
