I asked *where*, as in a link. Even suspected sockpuppets are fine, because checkuser is not a crystal ball, and I am not too shabby at patterns. The standard for reporting to police is common assault. That means an explicit threat of violence against a specific individual, organization or group. It is a lot more common in bars where you can read how serious they are. Hence the question to Durova about "How did that make you feel?". (It makes the written medium more difficult, and not impossible). The transaction must be accessible to police if not me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sarrukh&diff=prev&oldid=186083986 That counts as a personal attack on wikipedia. It does not count as common assault, so I do not see any visits from the F.B.I. prompted by the R.C.M.P., for Jeremy Hanson, today. Maybe some phone calls from vocal wikipedians...'What was the point of that comment you made to ...., saying "...", no wonder some people want to block Verizon... Why don't you spend time in news://alt.flame ? ... Lotsa room for a potty mouth in there. For that matter, there is room for people who want to make serious accusations against high and ancient religious figures. From the latin it is "Of the dead, only good". Following that standard, Hitler will be forgotten. "Al Tally" <majorly.w...@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:7c865bab0901151825h326d3189jbcd577b410c19...@mail.gmail.com... > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:40 AM, brewhaha%40edmc.net <brewh...@edmc.net>wrote: > >> >> a.. 2007-09-05T20:26:03 (hist) (diff) m Talk:Muhammad ? (moved >> Talk:Muhammad >> to Talk:Muhammad raped little children, and he was a known prostitute, aka >> male whore. He worshiped Satan and sacrificed babies in his name.) >> >> Okay...This is about the worst I hav found, and it does not go under the >> heading of common assault. So, where is this stuff where Jeremy Hanson >> makes >> threats about doing things like this? Overall, he seems like a bot that >> likes moving things to "HAGGER????". Under verizon's acceptable use policy, >> if they were enforcing it, yes, he could find himself and his mother >> disjoined from the internet. Under the law though, it is not common >> assault, >> so that hoped-for visit from feds is not likely. Hate-crimes? I did not >> look >> there, yet. They are not big in the western world. Remember the cartoons >> published? So, in total, I think range blocks are the best way to go. >> People >> with IDs will still be able to edit from verizon, and in fact people can >> obtain IDs via-e-mail, so I think "collateral damage" is a strong term for >> unintentional and temporary blocks. This will let the clerks nail down all >> of Grawp's accounts before he creates new ones. In a world of rampant >> excellence, verizon's users will ask verizon why, and verizon will ask >> someone at wikipedia in turn. Where is the common assault? >> > > You clearly haven't looked very far then. He's made hundreds of attacks on > editors in page moves and username creations. I won't say what they are, but > I assure you, they are nasty. > > -- > Alex > (User:Majorly) > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
