On 26/05/2009, Ken Arromdee <arrom...@rahul.net> wrote: > Wikipedia should not provide information that is likely to lead to harm. > If there's a rule which says that we must provide it, then that rule is > wrong.
Uh huh. And if it also is possible to use the information to avoid harm? What if it's only a tiny amount of harm, should it be removed then? And if not, how much harm does it take, and who gets to judge? In other words who died and made you head censor? -- -Ian Woollard "All the world's a stage... but you'll grow out of it eventually." _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
