> On 26/05/2009, Ken Arromdee <arrom...@rahul.net> wrote: >> Wikipedia should not provide information that is likely to lead to >> harm. >> If there's a rule which says that we must provide it, then that rule is >> wrong. > > Uh huh. And if it also is possible to use the information to avoid > harm? What if it's only a tiny amount of harm, should it be removed > then? And if not, how much harm does it take, and who gets to judge? > > In other words who died and made you head censor? > > -- > -Ian Woollard
We're all censors, we just vary with respect to what we censor. Fred Bauder _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
