Isn't "do what's right" the same as "assume good faith and assume the  
assumption of good faith" ?
 
The no-mans-land between "don't try to inflict malicious harm" and "report  
evidence-based statements" is a big fat gray one.
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/1/2009 11:17:48 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
arrom...@rahul.net writes:

This is  about IAR, you know.  IAR is inherently about using personal  
judgment;
if we modify IAR so that IAR may be used to do the right thing,  we should
*not* define "right" or even assume that it has one  definition.

**************Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the 
grill. (http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood00000005)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to