"Protecting people" is really very broad isn't it? How about "If the publication of certain information on a subject would lead a reasonable person to believe that it poses a credible threat to the subject's life." Much narrower. Will Johnson In a message dated 7/1/2009 12:11:52 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, arrom...@rahul.net writes:
No, because in this context, "do what's right" means "you may ignore rules for reasons other than the ones just listed". (It only lists improving and maintaining the encyclopedia; protecting people is not listed.) **************Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the grill. (http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood00000005) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
