Charles Matthews wrote: > The use of transclusion by section on Wikisource would make it > technically simple to bring the existing verses (or chapters) together > on pages for parallel reading. Of course it would be a lot of work ... > and I suppose it should be done chapter-wise. (Verses are at best a > convenience - chapter divisions have I think a wider acceptance, and are > at least historically older.) >
The really glaring exception to the chapter divisions tradition being hard and fast fixed is Book of John. In that case there is a scholarly argument that not only are the chapters not unambiguously divided, but that there is plausible evidence that the order of textual passages has been re-arranged. Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
