This is how I do it. If in "Plankton" we have only one other thing named
planton, then we shouldn't have a disamg page just for two items. That seems
overkill. So in that case SB_Plankton makes sense. If however in "Bob
Jones" we have 15 people, 3 things, and 2 places named "Bob Jones" then it
makes sense to have a disamg page.
I.E. there's a trade-off in having too many clicks, where it is? two
items? or three?
W.J
In a message dated 8/19/2009 7:37:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
carcharot...@googlemail.com writes:
> If there really is a chance that
> people will search for "plankton" in an attempt to find out about the
> SB character, then the hatnote should be neutral and direct people to
> a disambiguation page ("for other things named plankton, see here").
> And I don't care if that disambiguation page only has two entries.
> That is an acceptable trade-off to having a spongebob squarepants
> character name jarring people's reading experience by being placed at
> the top of an unrelated article.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
