"David Gerard" <dger...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:fbad4e140908200334n759b844dn5a0918285f843...@mail.gmail.com... > 2009/8/20 Carcharoth <carcharot...@googlemail.com>: > >> That is why I am saying that it is best to have a neutral form for >> hatnotes: >> "For other things with this name, see XXXX (disambiguation)". >> Or whatever the standard wording is. > > > {{otheruses}} and its variants. > > >> Anyway, in most cases of "two item disambiguation pages" there are >> actually more than two items. Even if they are redlinks, it is >> normally easy to expand said disambiguation page. That is preferable >> to having the trivial hatnote forcing people to read about something >> they might not want to read about. > > > Finding multiple items is generally pretty easy. At least one more. (I > was surprised and pleased to find so many for plankton.) > > (And I was previously unaware that jellyfish are in fact a variety of > plankton.)
I think that is a stretch, and I am not a phylogenist, so I hav no clue what rules to follow. It just seems that they are big and organized. Size is probably not a rule in phylogeny. In a sign of the times, I understand that some varieties are prolific. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l