On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, FT2 wrote: > Verifiability not truth is probably one of the most poorly understood > expressions on the wiki. > > It roughly means that we document what can be factually checked, in > preference to what we "believe".
Unfortunately, "roughly" isn't "precisely". This argument started with a verifiable-but-false claim which was factually checked, but where we're not allowed to use the result of the fact-checking (since it was a primary source and secondary sources take preference). The covered bridge example was also one ("I fact-checked the source by looking at the bridge. The source was wrong." is not acceptable.) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l