On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:34 AM, stevertigo <stv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds like just more strategic deletionist excusism. There is no > excuse for anyone giving to destruction a higher value than they do to > creation. > > So now that things are wrapping up, don't forget to hand out some > merit badges to the 'winners.' Ostensibly, there is a deletionist who > stands out from the pack, for whom a specially branded Trout Award > will do just fine.
WereSpielChequers could have expressed his concerns a bit better here. It seems that, under the guise of this project, some people are intentionally writing very low quality articles and then rules-lawyering over the specific speedy deletion category names: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASeb_az86556&action=historysubmit&diff=325921044&oldid=325918976 There can be a fine line between probing the boundary of new user treatment and a breaching experiment. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
