On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Ken Arromdee <arrom...@rahul.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > It seems that, under the guise of this project, some people are > > intentionally writing very low quality articles and then rules-lawyering > > over the specific speedy deletion category names: > > I'd argue that tagging something for speedy deletion when it doesn't > actually > fit the criteria is itself a form of rules lawyering. > > Actually, it's the other way around. Deliberately writing a bad article that should be deleted, but doesn't technically fit the CSD due to some loophole, sounds like the definition of disruption to make a point. I'd have to see a test case to say that for sure. - causa sui - causa sui _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
