On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > Samuel Klein wrote: >> A feature to improve the curating and presentation of these links >> might be handy. We have a few places were having a "set of links" as >> a first class member of the wikiverse would be useful >> * external links or further reading >> * a list of images related to an article (which may not all fit >> neatly in the article) >> * interlanguage and interproject links to a set of articles about the >> same topic >> > On the final point, the "poster" style of interwiki link to sister > projects begins to look dated, at least to me. It obviously doesn't > scale well; or in other words it puts the onus on the project linked to, > to organise the material relevant to one WP topic, in such a way that a > single link can carry the whole weight. Innovation is at least possible.
That's an interesting point. I presume you mean wikisource here. For Commons and Wikiquote (I'm unsure about the other projects) it is fairly easy to have a corresponding page or category or both. If the Wikipedia article is a person who is an author, then a wikisource page is possible, and if the Wikipedia page is about a book or other published work that could be on wikisource, then again a single link, page or category is usually possible. But there are some articles where this system does fall down. I presume the place to put links to editorially selected wikisource pages would be in the external links, or as a courtesy link in a citation. Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l