> Interesting phenomenon I have noticed here and there: these experts > choosing to work on Wikipedia on an entirely different topic > altogether. That is to say, someone quite qualified and competent to > write articles on Assyrian archaeology in the way we normally mean > when we say "expert", but instead writing at some length about > eighteenth-century music, on the grounds that Assyrian archaeology is > too much like the day job - besides, the articles are a mess, and this > other stuff is fun, damnit. > > Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing I leave as an exercise to > the reader. > > -- > - Andrew Gray > andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
I never had much interesting in editing articles on law; and, after a little experience with a "developer", little enthusiasm about arguing about generally accepted legal principles with a half-educated horse's ass. So I argued with a guy with a doctorate. Dumb arguments are maddening. Just how is one supposed to prove which way is up? Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
