>> >>> >>>> I could make out the last sentence >>>> which >>>> contained the phrases, "meaning of consensus", and "consent of the >>>> entire >>>> community". No one has yet defined for me the "meaning of consensus", >>>> nor >>>> described for me how the "consent of the entire community" is >>>> determined. >>>> >>>> Marc >>>> >>> on 2/1/11 7:52 PM, Fred Bauder at fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote: >> >>> We discuss policy issues at length, consider the reasons for adopting >>> alternatives, and come to agreement. >>> >> C'mon Fred, isn't that rather vague? What I'm asking (again) is, after >> the >> discussion is other, how is it determined that a consensus of the >> Community >> has been reached? >> >> Marc > on 2/1/11 9:24 PM, Fred Bauder at fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
> People agree and support the decision. > Fred, who are these people that are making these decisions and declaring that there in Community consensus, knowing that this "consensus" cannot be factually validated? Marc _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l