On 12 August 2011 17:19, Steve Summit <s...@eskimo.com> wrote: > Ken Arromdee wrote: >> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, David Gerard wrote:
>>> This is false. Print sources do not require a legal scan to be available. >> If you try using an illegal scan of a print source, you'll be told that >> you have no reason to believe the copy accurately represents the source. > I think David meant there's no rule that says there must be a > scan (legal or illegal) at all. > I think your point is that there's some precedent for rejecting > (or at least complaining about) sources that are only available > off-line. Rather than your interpretation, I'd like to see examples of what Ken's complaining about - whether he was told "you can't use that print reference" or whether he was told "you've linked to a scan that's a copyright violation". They're rather different things. -d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
