Ken Arromdee wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, David Gerard wrote: >> This is false. Print sources do not require a legal scan to be available. > > If you try using an illegal scan of a print source, you'll be told that > you have no reason to believe the copy accurately represents the source.
I think David meant there's no rule that says there must be a scan (legal or illegal) at all. I think your point is that there's some precedent for rejecting (or at least complaining about) sources that are only available off-line. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
