On 14 April 2013 12:24, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Mmm, I remember that mail and whom I suggested ... I didn't see you in that thread ... who were you thinking of? > I'm still quite deletionist on BLPs because of examples where our > "rules" are too easy to game. I'm certainly not an anti-stub > deletionist because that I see as destructive of future growth, and I > improve many stubs these days. If "passionate" means "nuance-free", > which is a fair cop much of the time, then I agree with you. I favour James Forrester and Thomas Dalton's arguments here: http://www.mail-archive.com/wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org/msg01454.html - that Wikipedia started as anything-goes, this was severely cut back and we're now closer to a nuanced equilibrium. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
