Well, if I may, that was a main concern while building our tool: http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org.pt/tools/plist
We wanted to know, in the end, the impact of WLM on everything we already had. So through that tool we can know which articles without photo got photographed, which photos don't even have an article, etc. These metrics are important when you want to state that WLM brought indeed benefit for WM projects. The same way, our WP heritage lists are reconstructed using this tool - still manually, though. -- Nuno Tavares Wikimedia Portugal http://www.wikimedia.pt Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer. Participe também: http://www.wikimedia.pt Em 12-12-2011 19:42, Strainu escreveu: > While some valid points have been raised in these discussions, there > was also a lot of bullshit (pardon my language, but there is no other > way of putting it) from some people who can't look beyond the current > project. It would be unfair from me to respond to those here, but I > will most certainly respond onwiki as time allows. > > What I do note as something that could easily be avoided is having > "ten more crappy images of the Eiffel Tower" in order to get some more > obscure monuments on-wiki. I strongly suggest that in countries that > participate in WLM2011 we limit the eligible monuments to those > without an image. > > In order to do this, we need better tools. I'm currently working on a > robot that can fill the lists automatically based on the articles that > contain a specific monument-id, and also searches for mistakes in the > lists. I certaily hope I'll be able to make it work for other > countries and I also hope that Nuno, Maarten, Platonides and the rest > of the folks that gave us those great reporting tools will also find > the time to develop tools for improving the usage of the newly > uploaded pictures. > > Strainu > > 2011/12/12 Mike Dupont <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com>: >> I have had the same issue with the Best Photo of Kosovo contest, but >> we had some small winners. >> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/BestPictureOfKosovoForWikipediaContest >> mike >> >> 2011/12/12 Tomasz Kozłowski <odder.w...@gmail.com>: >>> In chronological order: >>> #1: >>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011#Quality> >>> #2: >>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Anh%C3%A4user_Mauer.jpg> >>> #3: >>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:M%C4%83n%C4%83stirea_Chiajna_-_Giule%C8%99ti.jpg> >>> >>> :-( >>> >>> -- >>> Tomasz Kozłowski | [[user:odder]] >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >>> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments >>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu >> >> >> >> -- >> James Michael DuPont >> Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments >> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
