Dear Mahmoud,

Thank you for your prompt response. As far as I can see here:
https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/169
Alexey did everything he could do at this stage, and it is your turn now.

best,
Alexander


On 9/3/2020 2:24 AM, Mahmoud Hashemi wrote:
Yeah, I think we're waiting on responses from Alexey Baturin on those PRs. Is he on this list?

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:22 PM Alexander Tsirlin <altsir...@gmail.com <mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Dear Lodewijk,

    As for the status of Montage requests: I suggest that you start a
    separate thread on that, and would like to leave this to the
maintainers to respond to.
    I am asking because we fail to get any response at github since
    more than a month, and I would like to reach also those members of
    the international team who are not checking github regularly.
    Before we export something from Montage, we should make sure that
    it does not fail upon import.

    - Alexander



    On 9/3/2020 12:56 AM, effe iets anders wrote:
    Hi Alexander,

    As for the status of Montage requests: I suggest that you start a
    separate thread on that, and would like to leave this to the
    maintainers to respond to.

    As for publishing the settings: I was imagining some kind of
    log-style publication, not a near write-up. This won't be pretty,
    but it will allow people to figure out how it worked out in
    practice. If we follow a logical naming convention, people should
    be able to puzzle it together. Ideally, the national organizers
    also publish their process on the website, but this log would be
    a way to verify that. But I accept your note that we may need to
    add a context explaining that more process may happen
    before/after this tool is used.

    Lodewijk

    On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:17 PM Alexander Tsirlin
    <altsir...@gmail.com <mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        Dear Lodewijk,

        We also intend to publish by default the settings of the
        montage jury tool, and the number of photos in each round
        that the national competitions have used. We're debating
whether there should be an opt-out for this year.
        This is unrealistic, because jury process may involve several
        campaigns that are later merged together (in Russia, we do it
        all the time in order to meet your submission deadline).
        Moreover, some of the photos can be accepted for the next
        round within Montage but excluded later on if we find that
        they do not depict cultural heritage. The end result is that
        any number you take from Montage will not match the number of
        photos that we publish (e.g., as a short-list). This will
        only lead to confusion and won't be of any use for anyone.

        Since you mentioned Montage, let me also ask when two
        important pull requests, which were done by one of our team
        members, are going to be merged into the code:
        https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/169
        https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/175
        These are really, really important fixes. Without them I
        would have a problem creating new Montage campaigns in October.

        Sincerely,
        Alexander


    _______________________________________________
    Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
    WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
    <mailto:WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org>
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
    http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org


_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

Reply via email to