Am 21.06.2012 22:24, schrieb Anthony:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Andreas Kolbe<jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, Todd has certainly said on-wiki in the past that he would not see a
problem in Wikipedia using a video of rape to illustrate an article on the
topic, provided it were appropriately licensed and did not raise privacy
concerns (for example if the persons shown were no longer alive).
So would the same argument would apply to child porn, if the child is
dead, and if it weren't illegal?
The current situation seems to be that photos of child abuse are legal
(and are allowed on Wikipedia), and photos of sexual abuse are legal
(and are allowed on Wikipedia), but photos of child sexual abuse are
illegal (and aren't on Wikipedia except for a few disputed cases).
Can you point me to any examples of real "child abuse", "sexual abuse"
or of "child sexual abuse"?
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
