On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought about that but beyond the language issue, the RfC has also been > open for awhile and had significant participation. Since the trend is to > reject the policy as written anyway, that makes it unenforceable until a > new RfC is held that demonstrates consensus for a revised policy. Makes a > "no global bans" option somewhat moot, although it would have been cleaner > to include it from the beginning. >
I'm not sure I'd call it a trend just yet, since only 20 people have commented and only recently did "No, not yet" pass the Yes option. ;-) But enough semantics. Thanks for the suggestions Nathan, I think you're right. Steven _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
