On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Steven Walling <steven.wall...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I thought about that but beyond the language issue, the RfC has also been > > open for awhile and had significant participation. Since the trend is to > > reject the policy as written anyway, that makes it unenforceable until a > > new RfC is held that demonstrates consensus for a revised policy. Makes a > > "no global bans" option somewhat moot, although it would have been > cleaner > > to include it from the beginning. > > > > I'm not sure I'd call it a trend just yet, since only 20 people have > commented and only recently did "No, not yet" pass the Yes option. ;-) > > But enough semantics. Thanks for the suggestions Nathan, I think you're > right. > > Steven > Since I love semantics as much as any Wikimedian, just have to point out that even a 50/50 split is a trend against consensus ;) _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l