FT2, 12/09/2012 11:13:
1) Does IB believe there is a legal basis that members of the public (in the absence of contractual obligation) cannot consider where they and their fellow hobbyists want to engage in a hobbyisyt activity, be it drinking beer, discussing philosophy, playing cards, or writing online information? [...] In short, IB's problem is it conceived WT's content, and the community writing WT, and the WT site/brand, as its possessions, but the first two are not.
Actually, a fairer representation of what IB claims is that the "members of the public" are free to choose where to drink their beer, but someone with a "Pub X" cap in front of "Pub X" stopped all passing people and regulars that "Pub X" was renovating and to go to the new location "Pub Xb" across the street instead. Or that a clerk of "Y bookshop" used the list of all its customers and its official letter papers to mail them saying to send their next mail orders to the new postal address of "Yb bookshop".
Surely it's not trivial to prove, so to say... Nemo _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
