Hoi, You are conflating two tools .. they are still quite distinct.. - What you refer to is a query tool and IT provides you with the numbers you quote. - Reasonator provides you with a search functionality and a display functionality
So Reasonator gives you something like this [1] Thanks, GerardM [1] http://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?lang=nl&q=3356848 [1] On 24 January 2014 09:24, Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not convinced that this is useful (yet). I have been generating > some red-link lists for the upcoming international edit-a-thon about > Art & Feminism on February 1st, and I tried out this tool to see if I > could come with with lists of women artists already in other projects. > With Reasonator I see 503 female persons and 760 male persons. Not > very helpful (yet) for generating red-link lists. > > 2014/1/23, Risker <risker...@gmail.com>: > > On 23 January 2014 15:42, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> > wrote: > > > >> On 23 January 2014 15:12, Magnus Manske <magnusman...@googlemail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box > would > >> be > >> > the main "attraction"; but if infoboxes were to fall back on wikidata > >> > information, which they could technically already do, all we'd have to > >> > do > >> > is add a blank infobox, and it should automatically fill up with the > >> > wikidata information. In light of that, writing code to fill an > infobox > >> > with values form wikidata to paste into the article seems ... low-tech > >> ;-) > >> > >> Indeed - but we have to work with what we have. > >> > >> Perhaps we could concentrate on one very narrow subject, and its > >> single corresponding infobox, as a pilot? > >> > >> > >> > > > > I suggest that this discussion should be on the various projects that > might > > be affected, particularly as different projects have very different ideas > > about whether the use of Wikidata for anything more than language links > is > > acceptable. Many projects do not permit bulk bot creation of content, and > > this proposal is a close parallel. > > > > Further, content that isn't editable on the project on which it is hosted > > is probably not a very effective way to persuade people to turn it into > an > > actual page. > > > > Trialing the process on some small projects that actively volunteer to > > participate would be a first step. > > > > Risker/Anne > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>