Magnus, you are magical as always, thanks! What an odd list though - who has been working so diligently on Russian paintresses? Whoever you are, great work! meanwhile, sending more virtual kudos to Magnus while I dig into these results, Jane
2014/1/24, Magnus Manske <magnusman...@googlemail.com>: > A list of female painters with no article on en.wp: > http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/autolist.html?q=claim%5B106%3A1028181%5D%20and%20claim%5B21%3A6581072%5D%20%20and%20nolink%5Benwiki%5D > > (might take a few seconds to load) > > Cheers, > Magnus > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am not convinced that this is useful (yet). I have been generating >> some red-link lists for the upcoming international edit-a-thon about >> Art & Feminism on February 1st, and I tried out this tool to see if I >> could come with with lists of women artists already in other projects. >> With Reasonator I see 503 female persons and 760 male persons. Not >> very helpful (yet) for generating red-link lists. >> >> 2014/1/23, Risker <risker...@gmail.com>: >> > On 23 January 2014 15:42, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> >> wrote: >> > >> >> On 23 January 2014 15:12, Magnus Manske <magnusman...@googlemail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box >> would >> >> be >> >> > the main "attraction"; but if infoboxes were to fall back on wikidata >> >> > information, which they could technically already do, all we'd have >> >> > to >> >> > do >> >> > is add a blank infobox, and it should automatically fill up with the >> >> > wikidata information. In light of that, writing code to fill an >> infobox >> >> > with values form wikidata to paste into the article seems ... >> >> > low-tech >> >> ;-) >> >> >> >> Indeed - but we have to work with what we have. >> >> >> >> Perhaps we could concentrate on one very narrow subject, and its >> >> single corresponding infobox, as a pilot? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > I suggest that this discussion should be on the various projects that >> might >> > be affected, particularly as different projects have very different >> > ideas >> > about whether the use of Wikidata for anything more than language links >> is >> > acceptable. Many projects do not permit bulk bot creation of content, >> > and >> > this proposal is a close parallel. >> > >> > Further, content that isn't editable on the project on which it is >> > hosted >> > is probably not a very effective way to persuade people to turn it into >> an >> > actual page. >> > >> > Trialing the process on some small projects that actively volunteer to >> > participate would be a first step. >> > >> > Risker/Anne >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list >> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, >> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list >> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> >> > > > > -- > undefined > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>