On 26 February 2014 17:55, Yann Forget <yan...@gmail.com> wrote: ... > On this, I agree (at least partially) with David. If only some Commons > admins were not pursuing a political campaign to delete URAA-affected files > under false pretences, everything would be much better.
If you have the evidence that individual troublesome Commons admins are disrupting Commons against the aims of the project, then desysop them. As you know Yann, Commons has a simple governance process compared to most other Wikimedia projects, as described at <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators/De-adminship>. After the required /on-project/ discussion, the number of desysop votes needed would be fewer than the number of active members of most Chapters as it only needs a 50% majority to take effect. Fae -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
