> > > > I am genuinely puzzled as to why, if nobody on the WMUK board (such as > the CEO or the current Chairman) is sure what the purpose of the > conference is, they should chose to invest the donor's money in > sending 5 trustees and 3 full time employees to it (presumably the > employees are being paid for their time rather than going as > volunteers). > > Just to be clear, I know what the benefits we will get out of it are, and I can tell you the direction that I would like the conference to take in future; I'm just wondering whether others have the same perception.
This is not a new question, as Nathan has pointed out, and he is probably right to say it is best to continue it here; https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Future_of_the_Wikimedia_Conference Chris _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
