I'd certainly hope not. One of the ground rules for the workshop was that individual contributions were made on a confidential and non-attributable basis.
This was exactly because we wanted people to speak freely and not worry about a witch-hunt on an email list if a couple of trolls got hold of some out-of-context quotes. Chris On 7 Apr 2014 11:56, "Fæ" <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > Steffen, the Wikimedia movement expects board members on Wikimedia > organizations to be fulfilling their role as representatives of our > movement. If you misquoted please explain that this is the case. > > As at a public workshop that cost the movement a significant amount of > our donor's money to pay for, there is no reason for secrecy about > this, everyone there is accountable for their time spent at that > workshop. The quote has not been challenged. It would benefit us all > to hear why this was said and to be open to questions about their > leadership role, from the person that made this public statement. > > Personally, if an elected or appointed board level member of a chapter > is making public statements like this, I do not want them representing > our movement if they are going to hide away in secret when asked about > it. You know who they are, please ask them to speak for themselves > rather than relying on you and your colleagues to run interference or > take this story on tangents. > > Fae > > On 7 April 2014 11:42, Steffen Prößdorf <steffen.proessd...@wikimedia.de> > wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > please do not pick out that single point and overestimate it. > > I have not mentioned this to dupe anyone, but only to illustrate the > > conflict of alignment or the objective of the chapters. The opposing > > opinions are represented by several Wikimedians on both sides, please do > > not harp on this single quote. > > > > Thanks, > > Steffen > > > > > > 2014-04-07 12:33 GMT+02:00 Fæ <fae...@gmail.com>: > > > >> > If that is indeed the case, the comment to "fuck the community" would > fit > >> > quite well in the divisions that /some/ people are alleging exist. > >> > Tomasz > >> > >> Could whoever is being quoted as saying this please come forward > >> publicly and explain what they meant? > >> > >> If this was anything more than a bad joke, then I would expect someone > >> who made views like this, while representing our community of > >> volunteers to be asked by their Board to resign their elected or > >> appointed position. I urge those who were at the meeting, to > >> demonstrate appropriate community leadership and encourage the person > >> they know to have expressed this viewpoint to come forward and explain > >> themselves in their own words. > >> > >> Fae > -- > fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
