What is currently stopping a community assessment from being carried out? (If indeed the community has the actual desire to do it -- I assume the data is as public as it gets at the WMF's current level of transparency.)
Best regards, Bence On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 April 2014 14:35, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Risker, 27/04/2014 19:49: >> >> Well, no, I'm not misunderstanding. If a staff assessment is needed, then >>> it needs to be done by staff. >>> >> >> Inappropriate metonymy here, "staff" doesn't equal "WMF staff". Anyway, >> [citation needed]. >> >> > > Nemo, my position is that it shouldn't be being done at all because the > request is outside of the FDC's scope, and that assessment is done, then > community assessment will be more useful than a quasi-official, partial > assessment by a conflicted group that isn't "staff", has no experience > using the analytical metrics, and doesn't have the wherewithal to do a > complete the full assessment. The FDC does not have its own staff; it has > WMF staff appointed to assist them by creating staff assessments, in accord > with the FDC structure approved by the Board. The FDC doesn't get to pick > who does the assessments. > > > Risker > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
