I appreciate this, WWB, especially after the grilling I gave you about proposed edits to the Hedge fund article! The fact that you and your clients are persistent, willing to be open about your associations, and willing to abide by Wikimedia's CoI's standards even if it makes adding content take a lot longer, is a big plus. I hope you, your clients, and Wikipedia will mutually benefit from this in the long run.
Pine Pine On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Bishakha Datta <bishakhada...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:05 AM, William Beutler < > williambeut...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, everybody. Longtime lurker, first time writing to the list—the first > in > > a few years at least. > > > > You may have seen some news coverage today about an initiative from a > group > > of public relations, marketing, and communications agencies offering a > > statement, posted as a user essay on Wikipedia, stating in a public way > > their intention to follow Wikipedia's rules—especially regarding > WP:COI—to > > educate themselves more about Wikipedia, and educate their colleagues and > > clients in turn. > > > > > Thank you for posting this. It was a pleasant surprise and seems like a > sound and constructive approach to this issue. > > Best > Bishakha > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
